On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 09:06:35PM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote: >> I can't repeat d). I didn't remove anything related to the "po" directory >> from the "clean" target in r13964. For me, ant clean seems to work >> just fine: > > Yes, but it did not clean, as the temporary files have different names > now. > > --- build.xml (Revision 13997) > +++ build.xml (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ > <delete dir="${i18n.build.dir}" /> > <delete file="po/josm.pot"/> > <delete> > - <fileset dir="po" includes="*.po~" defaultexcludes="false"/> > + <fileset dir="po" includes="*.po*~" defaultexcludes="false"/> > </delete> > </target>
Oh, my bad. I didn't list the directory, but relied on "svn status", which didn't list the temporary files due to the built-in svn:ignore rules. >> Given issues a) and b), I will revert i18n/build.xml to use the exec >> tasks as before r13964. I'll try to add sorting the file names to the >> mix, so that the number of merge conflicts will be reduced in the future. > > I can live with b for some time, but not without a. But generally I think > this should be fixed in gettext-ant-tasks directly. > > Will they do this? Generally I like the ant-task based variant more than > the old method, but it must work, that's clear. Yes, the ant-task would be the "ant way of doing things". I will file issues against gettext-ant-tasks and hope the best. It looks like the developers are not keen to accept complex patches. The patch that I sent to http://code.google.com/p/gettext-commons/issues/detail?id=9 was rewritten. Marko _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev