Daniel - exactly. I would prefer to deprecate bind and move forward
with a cleaner name, tho I agree with Gilles on "bind" being a great
name right now. It just won't be in the near future.
On Jul 17, 4:19 pm, Daniel Friesen <nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Renamed are best done by creating the new name and leaving the old
> name around for compatibility.
>
> This isn't a "rename bind to something else and force everyone to
> change" it's a "give a new standard name for bind leaving the old name
> in place for old code so that new projects have a name they can use
> which isn't ambiguous with ES5's .bind()"
>
> I kindof like .event()
>
> On 17-Jul-09, at 9:19 AM, Gilles <gil...@netxtra.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > element.bind('click', someFunction, this); - This way allow backward
> > compatibility.
>
> > Your way, renaming the functions the most uses in plug-in, will mean
> > an aweful lot of developers will have to go through their code and
> > update it. And to be honest I don't see how anything else could
> > describe better what the function already does.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
