Well, i'm no apple nor cnn, but let me say i've tried prototype and jquery and i 've chosen jquery. With prototype, i couldn't ever figure how to write it correctly, and when i did find, i was WTF-ing at the code, like, "wow, javascript is complicated" . With jquery, i just try things, and, guess what, it works. Never seen such a short documentation that's so useful.
-----Original Message----- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Nathanson Sent: jeudi 14 juin 2007 20:36 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: CNN and Apple Choose Prototype. Why? > Most jQuery plugins, big exception for Interface, are superfluous IMO. > > If people took the time to really look into everything you can do with > jQuery + JavaScript's native features, they'd see how incredibly easy > it is to come up with a home grown solution that does specifically > what they need while taking up the least amount of space. I have to respectfully disagree. I've gotten great usage out of jEditable and tableSorter, and I haven't tried Jorn's validation plugin, but folks seem to love it. Even if you are dynamite at JS (which I'm not) you can save a lot of time leveraging these plugins. I don't use chaining a whole lot, but that's only because I prefer a more "vertical" style of code rather than "horizontal". I think it's a great feature to have available. -- Josh Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.472 / Base de données virus: 269.8.15/848 - Date: 13/06/2007 12:50
