Chris,
How is a new user going to know to do that on the front side? Your
creating a "dl" interface language just to use the list! LOL, now that
is a bit crazy. IMO it's not the number of words it's that it takes a
good cause in a complicated direction. One of the virtues of jQuery is
not being overloaded with un-needed functions. (Now should we turn
around and develop the dl in the opposite direction?) Keep it simple is
my thought.
John
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Also, you can't really get more self explainitory than "SITE
SUBMISSION: blah". Well, maybe you could with "SITES THAT USE JQUERY:
blah"
Chris
Rey Bango wrote:
Good feedback John. Our primary method of communication at the moment
is the mailing list so what I'd like to see is everyone nicely give a
nudge to anyone that doesn't submit a site using the prefix.
Eventually, most folks will catch on and we can tackle those that
aren't aware on a case-by-case basis.
Rey...
John Farrar wrote:
New users won't know this and posts will get lost and confused over
night. Which means we will have to ignore the heading also.
Better solution... multiple lists or a forum. (I believe we have
forgot the value of Newsgroups and Forums and try to do to much on
discussion lists.)
John Farrar
Rey Bango wrote:
Hey guys,
I usually take care of site submissions and I do my best to stay on
top of it. I've found that I've missed a couple of submissions to
the list as they got mixed in with others and I just overlooked it.
So I would like to propose a prefix for any site submissions that
would allow me to create a message filter and catch them
accordingly. I'm thinking something like this:
SITE SUBMISSION: The rest of the subject line
an example would be:
SITE SUBMISSION: Please jQuery.com to the list of sites
or
SITE SUBMISSION: LearningjQuery.com uses jQuery
Tell me what you think.
Rey
