When i look at Ext or Dojo or YUI, i always have a wow feeling... For a while i play around with them, and the next thing i know, i remember why i chose jquery. jquery is a great library that makes javascript easy as heaven. Once i realize this, again, i am outta dreamland and back into my favourite place...
First when i saw this post, i thought to myself that probably we dont need all those interface widgets. They make the page heavy to load, less responsive... Look at yahoo mail, it takes for ever. If i were to develop an enterprise app, i wouldn't use many javascript interface widgets (i would use some). But not all apps that are developed are enterprise apps. Even if they are, they need not use so many widgets as to make the page unresponsive. They can choose the right collection of widgets that will solve their purpose. This means that choosing jquery as their library of choice should not leave them stranded without cool outta the box widgets. The best javascript library sure should have the best collection of widgets. I agree, we have quite a few widgets and many are cool. But, i guess we need to make it more tight. I am just thinking out loud here. We probably just need a more coherent effort to develop great interface components. I know, i didnt say anything new that u guys dont know. I was just saying what i felt. -GTG On 6/26/07, Gilles (Webunity) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And i am also creating some widgets (including the unobtrusive > combobox) for jQuery........ > > > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/4ebf9924c0a33ac4 > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery (English)" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-en@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
