> I noticed that you have added String.prototype.trim. jQuery actually
> has this already, e.g. jQuery.trim(" foo ");
Wow, I totally missed this, thanks, I'll get it changed over.
> An easy was to get better CSS support in browsers that are not up to
> it. Maybe in a future version, browsers that are capable will just be
> ignored?
Yep, absolutely. If you have any ideas on how we could test a browsers
support for a selector without maintaining a hard coded list then I
would love to hear them.
> Also, maybe best to wrap it in a closure:
>
> (function($) {
> // plugin code here, use $ as much as you like
>
> })(jQuery);
Yep, totally agree, this is in the next version. (Like I said, I was
very tired!).
Thanks for the feedback,
Andy.
On 8 Oct, 11:37, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that you have added String.prototype.trim. jQuery actually
> has this already, e.g. jQuery.trim(" foo ");
>
> An easy was to get better CSS support in browsers that are not up to
> it. Maybe in a future version, browsers that are capable will just be
> ignored?
>
> Also, maybe best to wrap it in a closure:
>
> (function($) {
> // plugin code here, use $ as much as you like
>
> })(jQuery);
>
> On Oct 7, 12:39 am, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
>
> > This is a plug-in that was thrown together in a few spare hours after
> > chatting with some people at FOWA last week, I hadn't had much sleep
> > at the time so it's still a bit rough round the edges.
>
> > In a nutshell though it gives you full support for all jQuery
> > selectors from within your CSS files in a totally unobtrusive mannor.
> > This effectively means cross browser CSS3 support via JavaScript.
>
> > You can find out more and grab it from:
>
> >http://andykent.bingodisk.com/bingo/public/jss/
>
> > Any feedback, good or bad would be appreciated.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Andy.
