polyrhythmic wrote: > It is a very useful tool but I don't think it's ready for the jQuery > core yet, as you can see there are very complicated and very simple > ways to wait/pause the jQuery execution chain -- we'd have to > standardize a method first. >
I think this makes a good first impression but the ".then" starts to annoy me after a while (looking at the code I can see why it's there, but it still "feels" superfluous <--- I don't get to use that word very often!): |$('#myNode').wait(2).then.hide();| And of course, it's code is pretty heavy compared to the Pause plugin. I do prefer .wait() to .pause() though. Although maybe .pause() would be more palatable if .unpause() was renamed to .continue(), .resume() or .play()? Meh, 5am and I need sleep. nn