You could declare a function and give it a name, instead of using an
anonymous function, then pass that as the success function for each ajax
call.
- Richard
On Dec 14, 2007 8:51 AM, Mario Moura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No.
>
> Let me explain better.
>
> In your scenario you made a individual AJAX request and into this request
> you create rules.
>
> But JQuery could create an universal AjaxSucess to test all data from all
> ajax requests.
>
> So imagine this scenario:
>
> The page have a lot of AJAX requests, something like ajaxform, $.ajax,
> $.post, $.get
>
> So from response of each AJAX we could create a function like: (and I will
> use switch)
>
>
> $().ajaxSuccess (function() {
> switch( $(data).attr("id") ) { // here I get the data from AJAX
> Sucess every time happen could by by xml, json but I am using div
> case 'myid':
> // do stuff with data;
> break;
> case 'myid2':
> // do stuff with data;
> break;
> }
>
> no matter if it is from $.ajax({"type": "POST", "url": " foo1.php ",});
> or $.ajax({"type": "POST", "url": "foo2.php "}); or $.ajax({"type":
> "POST", "url": "foo3.php ",});
>
> But at this moment. I think is not possible. But could be a good improve.
>
> Did you understand?
>
> Regards
>
> Mario Moura
>
> 2007/12/14, Giovanni Battista Lenoci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > Don't know if I understood,
> >
> > $.ajax({"type": "POST",
> > "url": " foo2.php",
> > "data": data,
> > "dataType": "json",
> > "success": function(server_response) {
> > switch(server_response.wich_function) {
> > case '1':
> > on_success_one(server_response);
> > break;
> > case '2':
> > on_success_two(server_response);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > });
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mário Alberto Chaves Moura
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 31-3264-6203
> 31-9157-6000
