On May 25, 1:26 pm, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > > I want to have both $ and $D; but in $D, I want to override some > > functions like 'click', 'hover'. Till now, $ and $D gets overwritten > > and so I couldn't use $ or couldn't override $D.click > > Is it absolutelly necessary, that $D has all the other jQuery functionality? > If not just hav the code you need in $D.
Not necessary, but I want to have them chained with jQuery object > Is it absolutelly necessary, that the functions have the name click() and > hover()? Maybe you can simply add dclick() and dhover to jQuery. Yes, I want to override click > If both are necessary I'd still stick to Michaels question: Why? Sometimes > there are other solutions to a problem that one doesn't see untill someone > else hits ones nose to it. Tell us why you need it that way and we can think > about alternative solutions. I wrote a jQuery version of http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/2006/09/behaviorsjs-alternative-to-behaviourjs.html which is actually event delegation based. The idea was to replace $ ('foo').click() with $D('foo').click() whenever necessary to speed up the pages. It was working fine, but I lost the code. Now, I'm trying to rewrite the same and now can't do that with the idea that I had in mind. -- <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?> Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
