> WOW! Check out the last 2 tests, John. Syntax #4 takes 512-times
> longer than #5! I think this code needs a little TLC too ;)
>
> It was also interesting that $("#div500").children("p") is 10-times
> slower than $("#div500").find("p"). So I added one final test using
> childNodes and filter() to see if I could beat .children()...Oh right, this is a regression to what I just did - I can tweak that. I'll look in to it tonight. --John
