impressive but has some flaws (large numbers, sorting w/o clicking headers, etc). not a complete fix but definitely a 95+% solution -- neat!
aquaone On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 00:00, MorningZ <morni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not the prettiest code i've ever written, but: > > 1) It works :-) > 2) Didn't touch one single character in tablesorter.js > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/109306/ > > (Make sure you are viewing it in Firefox with FireBug going, or > comment out the "console.log"-s and set Tablesorter's option of > "debug" to "false") > > > > > On Mar 24, 12:30 am, Flight553 <flight...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > you were on the right track with the ".addParser" method but there's > > > no need to edit it inside the core code > > > > Ok, I'll bite. How? addParser() just lets you determine one value that > > goes to sortnumeric(a, b) or sorttext(a, b). Those methods are > > designed to put a value on top when sorting one direction, and on > > bottom when sorting the other direction. How can you get a value to > > always be sorted to the bottom using addParser? > > > > I know the patching I offered sucked, but don;t know how else to do it > > with the tablesorter.js code as exists. > > > > Suggestions? >
