Never said it was a "ready for production with a zillion rows"... just call it a "proof of concept" that tablesorter is *very* flexible, in fact I would call it the most flexible plugin I've seen in the 15 months or so i've been into jQuery...... given more time, and the need for me to use it, that parser could be tightened up..
in the end though, what I would do if i was presented with the problem of "putting null rows at the bottom" is do this when the table is generated from the server code (PHP, CF, .NET, etc) and put them into the <tfoot>... then the table would look the same plus tablesorter would leave them alone On Mar 24, 4:49 am, aquaone <aqua...@gmail.com> wrote: > impressive but has some flaws (large numbers, sorting w/o clicking headers, > etc). not a complete fix but definitely a 95+% solution -- neat! > > aquaone > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 00:00, MorningZ <morni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not the prettiest code i've ever written, but: > > > 1) It works :-) > > 2) Didn't touch one single character in tablesorter.js > > >http://paste.pocoo.org/show/109306/ > > > (Make sure you are viewing it in Firefox with FireBug going, or > > comment out the "console.log"-s and set Tablesorter's option of > > "debug" to "false") > > > On Mar 24, 12:30 am, Flight553 <flight...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > you were on the right track with the ".addParser" method but there's > > > > no need to edit it inside the core code > > > > Ok, I'll bite. How? addParser() just lets you determine one value that > > > goes to sortnumeric(a, b) or sorttext(a, b). Those methods are > > > designed to put a value on top when sorting one direction, and on > > > bottom when sorting the other direction. How can you get a value to > > > always be sorted to the bottom using addParser? > > > > I know the patching I offered sucked, but don;t know how else to do it > > > with the tablesorter.js code as exists. > > > > Suggestions?
