Now, Charlie...no need to be so "snippy". :o)
Just because I have complaints that JS isn't like CF in some ways,
doesn't mean I don't want to grow in my understanding and application of JS.
Anyway, your method is a lot more code, and may be slower than
using the replace in the JS.
I just wanted to see how it performed.
Now, I think it's about bedtime for someone.... ;o)
Rick
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Charlie Griefer
<charlie.grie...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Rick Faircloth
> <r...@whitestonemedia.com> wrote:
> > That worked, Ricardo...to a point.
> > (Haven't tried your solution, Charlie...)
> >
> > I actually just embedded the replace function in the code like this:
> >
> > out.push('<div id="sectionTextDIV">' + row[4].replace(/\r?\n/, '<br/>') +
> > '</div>');
> >
> > and that worked, but only for the first line break in the text.
> >
> > I tried adding 'all', like I do when I use the replace function in CFML,
> > but it had no effect.
> >
> > ...'<br/>', 'all') + '</div>');
> >
> > Suggestions?
>
> Sure. I suggest you return the data in the format that you need it to be
> in.
>
> You've complained in the past that JS isn't like CF. Here's a place
> where you can play to your strengths and manipulate the string prior
> to returning it from the remote CFC call.
>
> --
> I have failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my life. I love
> my wife. And I wish you my kind of success.
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It has been my experience that most bad government is the result of too
much government." - Thomas Jefferson
