test with the minified version :) On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Acaz Souza <acazso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone, i will do some tests with this librarys, i will elevate > the CPU usage and tests in the major browsers. > > On 5 dez, 09:57, waseem sabjee <waseemsab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > to be honest no library is 100% efficient. > > its like a template that anyone can download. what counts as what you do > > with it and if suits your needs. > > > > in some cases you would create your very own template if nothing suits > your > > needs. > > > > so if you require 100% smoothness in everything you would require only > the > > pieces of scripts that you are using and nothing more. > > > > regardless of the library you choose code that you do not use will always > > exist. > > say if you find a js lib where each function is its' own file. it would > > be efficient as you include only what you need. however it would take > longer > > for all your scripts to load as the user would have to download each one. > > > > unfortunately i cannot fully answer your questions. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Acaz Souza <acazso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, i´m from brazilian, my english is too bad. Sorry for bad > > > questions. > > > > > But, ok ok, This depends on the computer hardware, engine of the > > > browser, how the plugin is written and more... > > > > > But, another question, The algorithm of animation that has been made > > > in jquery to give the best quality in this regard? > > > > > I want to say this, the jquery it was done with lower quality > > > animation to preserve the other strengths? (Or Not?) > > > > > Because i have a project to build, and smoothing is very important to > > > me. I like jquery, but sometimes i see mootools more smooth than > > > jquery. > > > > > And the other animations frameworks, anyone know if they are better in > > > this point? > > > > > On 5 dez, 01:04, Dave Methvin <dave.meth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ok, I've used some code I had lying around and put dummy content in > > > there:http://www.tnt.be/bugs/jquery/moovsjquery/ > > > > > > > I actually don't really see a difference on my Ubuntu box (using FF > > > > > 3.6b4), but there's a huge difference on a colleague's G4 (OS X > 10.4, > > > > > Firefox 3.5.5), so try to find a slow computer to test this on. > > > > > > Jonathan, thanks for doing the demo. Pretty nice demo, by the way! > > > > > > I tried it on my system, but it's a fast Dell notebook running > Windows > > > > 7. The demo ran smoothly on Firefox 3.5, IE8, Opera 10, and Chrome 3. >
