Hi There already few replies and will "+1" to jsTestDriver it's best runner on the market now. One point regarding tests dependent - it's not a really good idea, the idea of tests is show how major the problem is, if you break 1 test it most of all means simple problem, if you broke 1K+ tests - major point. When I've start use tests I thought like you do it, but reality shows that you don't need to stop runner on first fail.
Have a good luck with testing, not much js developers do that and I'm glad you 1 of us :) Anton. On Dec 24, 2010, at 1:28 AM, Glan wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm interested in getting some people's thoughts on unit testing in > javascript. I've been looking at qUnit, but an aware of a number other > methods jsunit,jsspec, jspec etc. With qUnit in particular there are a > few areas which I'm still unsure about: > > 1) Making tests dependent on one another, so if one test fails > dependent tests are not run. > 2) Detecting exceptions. If a function throws an exception, how can > one lookout for this? > 3) Producing code coverage reports. > > Regards, > Glan > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
