HTML files become JSP files just by changing the extension to .jsp and using
a JSP engine, but I assume it is more efficient to use the .jsp extension
only when exploiting JSP advantages. Is this true? Within a single web
site it would seem to make sense to have both types of pages present on the
site. So, the question I have is does it ever make sense to use the .jsp
extension on all pages within a site? At least on Microsoft's site, it
seems that almost all pages are ASP files, even when an HTML file would
probably work fine. Similarly, what do I gain or give up by making all
pages JSP files?
Thanks,
Steve
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
