MS IIS 5.0 doesn't actually interpret .asp files that have no dynamic
content. It's as good as plain 'ol HTML. So, there's no overhead. Not
true abt. JSPs, I guess.
:-((
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Bang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 5:24 PM
Subject: Developing sites with JSP and HTML
> HTML files become JSP files just by changing the extension to .jsp and
using
> a JSP engine, but I assume it is more efficient to use the .jsp extension
> only when exploiting JSP advantages. Is this true? Within a single web
> site it would seem to make sense to have both types of pages present on
the
> site. So, the question I have is does it ever make sense to use the .jsp
> extension on all pages within a site? At least on Microsoft's site, it
> seems that almost all pages are ASP files, even when an HTML file would
> probably work fine. Similarly, what do I gain or give up by making all
> pages JSP files?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
> http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
> http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
> http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
