hmm...
closure bukan berarti gak oop,
tapi lebih enak pake closure kalo fungsi gak dianaktirikan.
lebih enak lagi kalo fungsi juga bisa jadi object :P
-adji-
2008/10/9 irfani YangBaikHati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> closure bukan brarti ga OOP.
> di ruby, block of code adalah sebuah object.
>
> List<String> objects = new ArrayList...
>
> for (String o: objects ) {
> System.out.println(o);
> }
>
> dgn closure, misal spek nya gini:
> objects.each( [String o, System.out.println(o); ] );
>
> less verbose, bs cpt, byk kemungkinan, melakukan hal2, dgn kirim some chunk
> of codes, utk manipulasi di scope object container nya
>
> 2008/10/9 Bayuadji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> hum hum...
>> agak aneh juga kalo pake closure dijava, soalnya di java
>> fungsi masih dianaktirikan :p
>>
>> kalo mau maen2 pake closure pake groovy aja, kalo gak langsung pake kawa
>> :P
>>
>> -adji-
>
>
>
> --
> irfani
>
> http://irfani.web.id
> Y! irfani_s
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.tumbletooth.org
my linkedin profile : http://www.linkedin.com/in/bayuadji
--------------------------------------------------------------
