I actually don't see a problem with removing apt-get upgrade, but what apt-get update? It's only 20s user time according to the original post. For stale cloud images, local provider and manual, it's just a no brained.
Marco On Jul 1, 2014 4:04 PM, "David Britton" <david.brit...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Andrew, >> >> I ran into a problem when Juju was no longer calling "apt-get update". I >> filed bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1336353 >> >> > Agreed -- I've fixed this "problem" multiple times in charms by making the > first step apt-get upgrade. Which always seemed a bit wasteful to me. :) > > It happens more on the local provider since those images are copied from > templates which are not rebuilt until you remove them (do lxc-ls --fancy to > see them). So, the templates package cache goes out of date, and your > cloned machine also goes out of date. > > -- > David Britton <david.brit...@canonical.com> > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > >
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
