On 15/07/14 14:17, Tim Penhey wrote: > On 15/07/14 15:48, Ian Booth wrote: >>> >>> * FAIL: managedstorage_test trusty ppc64 >>> from 2014-06-30 which had a secondary bug that broke compilation. >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1336089 >>> >> >> This bug brings up another issue. >> The code concerned has now been moved off to a juju sub project - >> blobstorage. >> So the juju-core ppc64 tests will no longer fail. >> >> Martin is in the process of setting up Jenkins landing jobs for all the sub >> projects (there are several). But there won't initially be ppc64 variants of >> these jobs. So it will be possible for juju-core to now pass ppc64 testing >> even >> though sub projects it depends on may not. > > Surely this just means that we need real end to end tests on all > supported architectures, right? >
In theory. The number of combinations will be large and I'm not sure we currently have the capacity to do that? But the issue also it that functional tests may well pass even though some particular unit tests fail. -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
