This is a bit rough, I have not had time to make it better or add the other less common use cases or HA but should give a more decent explanation https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1AtAo-uxED5TvXahJNytF-PIswRv9T0lewcyu699Rpyk/edit?usp=sharing
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Eric Snow <eric.s...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.pen...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > I'm seriously not in favour of calling it "recover", and not just > > because it has a particular meaning in Go. > > I'm glad you said so then. :) > > > > > Perhaps "rebuild" or "recreate", but "recover" feels wrong. > > Got it. I'm not married to "recover". It was just the first > reasonable (to me) alternative that popped into my head. > > "rebuild" and "recreate" could work, though they don't seem quite > right either. Perhaps something more like "replace" or "reset"? So > far it's all re* names, so maybe "wipe"? :) The catch is that it will > be a subcommand of "juju backups" so it also needs to be something > that implies applying a backup rather than affecting a backup. Hmm. > "apply"? > > -eric > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
