I'll also note that Tim had some good ideas about how to change the Local provider to be more consistent with other providers. (Essentially creating a separate process that could implement a "Remote Provider" sort of interface.) That could allow bringing up more 'pluggable' providers that just talk the same language as the 'local' one would. I personally would prefer if we used a command line interface (call this process with these arguments to start an instance), even if the local one would use the command line to make RPC/socket calls to another process. (If you think about it, all of them are just sending requests to some other long-lived process over a socket, but I'd rather not have to run a full service for every system we want to interact with.) John =:->
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:33 AM, John Meinel <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote: > There is work being done this cycle to switch from using storage from the > Provider to instead using our own internal storage. I don't know that the > work will be done for another few months, though. I believe Tim Penhey is > going to be leading up that work as part of exposing Resources for charms > to consume. I'm sure he'd be happy to coordinate with someone who wants to > work on moving us over to having storage internally. > > John > =:-> > > > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Benoît Canet <benoit.ca...@irqsave.net>wrote: > >> The Monday 05 May 2014 à 22:36:52 (-0400), Kapil Thangavelu wrote : >> > from https://wiki.outscale.net/display/DOCU/AWS+Compatibility+Matrix >> > >> > its a little unclear if outscale implements object storage compatible >> with >> > s3. if so then support in core would probably amount to making the >> ec2/s3 >> > api endpoint url pluggable in the core code, along with userdata support >> > and cloudinit and compatible os images in outscale cloud. >> >> From what I know Outscale implement only EC2 compute: no object storage. >> How could we work around this ? >> >> Best regards >> >> Benoît >> >> > >> > cheers, >> > >> > Kapil >> > >> > >> > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Benoît Canet <benoit.ca...@irqsave.net >> >wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > I am a developper planning to add the support for the Outscale cloud >> into >> > > juju-core. >> > > >> > > The Outscale cloud implement most of the EC2 API. >> > > >> > > Does the Juju maintainer have some guidance on how the support should >> be >> > > written ? >> > > >> > > Best regards >> > > >> > > Benoît Canet >> > > Nodalink >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Juju mailing list >> > > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> > > >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> > >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
