Le mercredi 15 janvier 2014 à 22:39 -0800, Tobias Knopp a écrit : > But why isn't float32 promoting to float64 on basic arithmetics then? > > As Markus pointed out, when we get SIMD support (in the form of the > @simd macro or by autovectorization of llvm) there can be a factor of > two between both integer computations. > > P.S.: Hope you don't get this wrong. Its just a very minor nitpick on > one of the most awesome type systems I have ever seen. Don't be sorry -- they only get what they deserve for creating Julia: we have become greedy too. ;-)
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficiency vs C ... Simon Kornblith
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficiency ... Przemyslaw Szufel
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficie... Földes László
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Simon Kornblith
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Przemyslaw Szufel
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational... Földes László
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational... Iain Dunning
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... John Myles White
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Tobias Knopp
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Milan Bouchet-Valat
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Ivan Tong
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Job van der Zwan
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Ivan Tong
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Job van der Zwan
- Re: [julia-users] Julia computational... Marcus Urban