MPFR and GMP are LGPL, which is not quite as problematic or viral. Some of SuiteSparse is GPL, parts of it are LGPL, and at least one file of the Julia code in base for sparse matrices that is based on parts of SuiteSparse is also LGPL.
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:18:45 AM UTC-7, Jake Bolewski wrote: > > Are there any more liberally licensed libraries that get close to the > functionality in MPFR, I know that there are some non-GPL BigInt > implementations out there although I don't think any match GMP's > performance. > > On Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:13:20 AM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> There's been a lot of talk about turning various bits of functionality >> like GMP, MPFR, FFTW and such into packages that simply happen to be >> pre-loaded by default, making it easy to get a much more spare basic Julia >> version. This will definitely happen over the summer. Note that OpenBLAS is >> BSD-license, so using MKL is not necessary for non-GPL Julia. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Isaiah Norton <isaiah...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Rmath too, but I think that is on the way out. All of the licenses are >>> linked here: >>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/master/LICENSE.md >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Jake Bolewski <jakebo...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> As readline is now removed I think GMP (BigInt's) and MPFR (arbitrary >>>> precision floating points) are the only GNU ibraries left if you are able >>>> to use MKL and don't require FFTW. Steven also working on a branch where >>>> he provides FFT support in pure julia. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Jake >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:26:55 AM UTC-4, Jay Kickliter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There are bits and pieces in Github issues and posts, but can post a >>>>> definitive list of what needs to be replaced/removed to make Julia non >>>>> GPL? >>>>> Will any functionality be missing? From what I understand I can use MKL >>>>> for >>>>> some stuff. I've read that MKL has the ability to mimic FFTW, but will >>>>> Julia use that interface? >>>>> >>>>> For the record I'm not anti-GPL. I'd like to pitch Julia to my company >>>>> as alternative to Matlab and C++. But our customers can't accept a >>>>> project >>>>> built with GPL. It's not a problem now, but I'm looking down the road >>>>> when >>>>> Julia can be compiled in to executables. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
