Great! It seems it was the lack of array dimensions on the type specification that was causing the slowdown. W/ a bit of further fiddling I've gotten it down to 2x C speed and now just have to work out a way to parallelise it effectively
- [julia-users] slow julia version of c code Zac
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia version of c code Milan Bouchet-Valat
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia version of c code Tim Holy
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia version of c cod... Zac
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia version of c... Jake Bolewski
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia version ... Zac
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia ver... Tim Holy
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia ver... Simon Kornblith
- Re: [julia-users] slow julia... Gunnar Farnebäck
- Re: [julia-users] slow j... Zac
- Re: [julia-users] slow j... Tony Fong
- Re: [julia-users] slow j... John Myles White
- Re: [julia-users] slow j... Zac