+1 to addering to the git flow, I had also allways expected for the master branch to be as stable and possible, while development happening in another branch, not the other way around and sometimes I've had to search for a past working commit in order to build julia, which strikes me as odd, as you guys really follow good development techniques.
Would it be difficult to change this, maybe for a post 0.4 era? El lunes, 29 de diciembre de 2014 10:36:19 UTC-6, Christian Peel escribió: > > Dan Luu has a critique of Julia up at http://danluu.com/julialang/ > (reddit thread at http://bit.ly/1wwgnks) > Is the language feature-complete enough that there could be an entire > point release that targeted some of the less-flashy things he mentioned? > I.e. commented code, better testing, error handling, and just fixing > bugs? If it's not there, is there any thoughts on when it would be? > >
