Maybe its not so bad if you just always include * where it should be, i.e. p = 1; 2*p+1 works fine.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Christoph Ortner < christophortn...@gmail.com> wrote: > For what it's worth, it always struck me is as odd that dropping the * for > multiplication is allowed. Is it worth dropping this instead of the p, e > notation? > Christoph > >
