Already there: #6770
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Tim Holy <tim.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, January 05, 2015 08:15:03 AM Hans W Borchers wrote: >> By the way, has the bug x = 10; x.1 returning 1.0 been handled in 0.4? It's >> still there in 0.3. > > Nope. If you haven't filed an issue already, please do. > > --Tim > >> >> On Monday, January 5, 2015 2:32:00 PM UTC+1, Simon Byrne wrote: >> > * julia> 3e+1* >> > >> >> * 30.0* >> >> >> >> *julia> 3e + 1* >> >> >> >> * 9.154845485377136* >> > >> > Perhaps this is a good reason to change behaviour such that e is no longer >> > a constant: it has always seemed bit odd to use a valuable latin singleton >> > in this way. We could use a unicode script e (U+212F) instead, as >> > suggested >> > by wikipedia: >> > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerals_in_Unicode#Characters_for_mathematic >> > al_constants >> > >> > s >
