So "Git" won't remove files untracked (e.g., executables, libraries), so that "make" can decide which files to rebuild. Is it right?
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 4:43:22 AM UTC+2, Isaiah wrote: > > LLVM requires the most time, and the version has not been bumped so > recompile will not be required. OpenBLAS is probably second and it has been > bumped, so will require recompile. By the way, to track 0.4-pre > (development version) you need `git checkout master`. > > However, do be aware that there is *a lot* of breakage in packages running > against 0.4-dev right now due to some recent changes (see recent threads > here and on julia-dev). Many packages are still catching up. Running 0.4 is > not recommended right now unless you are fixing packages, or you know that > any packages you need have been updated. See status here: > > http://pkg.julialang.org/pulse.html > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Sisyphuss <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I built Julia v0.3 from the source code. It took me a lot of time. >> >> Now if I want to "git checkout v0.4", will it take me a lot of time to >> build again? >> > >
