Thanks to you two! Your responses are very clear.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Jameson Nash <[email protected]> wrote: > (of course, if you decide that you actually want git to clean up any > untracked files and get back to a pristine repository state, `clean -fdx && > git reset --hard origin/master` is a nuclear option. but other than that, > Isaiah is correct) > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:00 AM Isaiah Norton <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So "Git" won't remove files untracked (e.g., executables, libraries), so >>> that "make" can decide which files to rebuild. Is it right? >>> >> >> Right, git only tracks the code. See the `.gitignore` files. `usr/` is >> ignored completely, as are the subdirectories in `deps/`. >> >> >> >>> >>> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 4:43:22 AM UTC+2, Isaiah wrote: >>>> >>>> LLVM requires the most time, and the version has not been bumped so >>>> recompile will not be required. OpenBLAS is probably second and it has been >>>> bumped, so will require recompile. By the way, to track 0.4-pre >>>> (development version) you need `git checkout master`. >>>> >>>> However, do be aware that there is *a lot* of breakage in packages >>>> running against 0.4-dev right now due to some recent changes (see recent >>>> threads here and on julia-dev). Many packages are still catching up. >>>> Running 0.4 is not recommended right now unless you are fixing packages, or >>>> you know that any packages you need have been updated. See status here: >>>> >>>> http://pkg.julialang.org/pulse.html >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Sisyphuss <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I built Julia v0.3 from the source code. It took me a lot of time. >>>>> >>>>> Now if I want to "git checkout v0.4", will it take me a lot of time to >>>>> build again? >>>>> >>>> >>>>
