(of course, if you decide that you actually want git to clean up any untracked files and get back to a pristine repository state, `clean -fdx && git reset --hard origin/master` is a nuclear option. but other than that, Isaiah is correct)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:00 AM Isaiah Norton <[email protected]> wrote: > So "Git" won't remove files untracked (e.g., executables, libraries), so >> that "make" can decide which files to rebuild. Is it right? >> > > Right, git only tracks the code. See the `.gitignore` files. `usr/` is > ignored completely, as are the subdirectories in `deps/`. > > > >> >> On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 4:43:22 AM UTC+2, Isaiah wrote: >>> >>> LLVM requires the most time, and the version has not been bumped so >>> recompile will not be required. OpenBLAS is probably second and it has been >>> bumped, so will require recompile. By the way, to track 0.4-pre >>> (development version) you need `git checkout master`. >>> >>> However, do be aware that there is *a lot* of breakage in packages >>> running against 0.4-dev right now due to some recent changes (see recent >>> threads here and on julia-dev). Many packages are still catching up. >>> Running 0.4 is not recommended right now unless you are fixing packages, or >>> you know that any packages you need have been updated. See status here: >>> >>> http://pkg.julialang.org/pulse.html >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Sisyphuss <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I built Julia v0.3 from the source code. It took me a lot of time. >>>> >>>> Now if I want to "git checkout v0.4", will it take me a lot of time to >>>> build again? >>>> >>> >>>
