Isn't JuliaBox a registered trade mark?
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 1:50:29 AM UTC+2, Daniel Carrera wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I just finished putting together a basic mockup of what a Julia IDE might > look like. I'm calling it JuliaBox: > > Source: https://github.com/dcarrera/JuliaBox > > Screenshot: > https://github.com/dcarrera/JuliaBox/blob/master/screenshots/screenshot-01.png > > > This is literally just a shell and it doesn't *DO* anything yet. But I > think this is a good way to start thinking about what it would take to > write an IDE for Julia in Julia. The idea is that as we try to implement > concrete features, we'll get a better idea of what are the missing pieces. > > If you want write access to the Git repo just let me know. I know I'm not > the best coder here, and I'd love to see a group effort going. > > If you look at the README file, you'll see my current thoughts on what > components are missing, and where we might get them. > > Cheers, > Daniel. > > > > > On 14 September 2015 at 17:40, Matt Bauman <mba...@gmail.com <javascript:> > > wrote: > >> On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 9:44:07 AM UTC-4, Andrei Zh wrote: >>> >>> To continue Michael's answer, I think it would be nice to collect list >>> of most important features that existing editors for Julia still lack and >>> think out what can be improved. So far I've seen following features: >>> >>> * integrated debugger -- currently work in progress (Gallium.jl), so >>> it may change soon >>> * better integration with REPL -- AFAIK, Emacs is the only editor that >>> has this integration (via ESS mode) so far >>> * code refactoring >>> * built-in documentation (in addition to Julia's own help system, I >>> suppose) >>> * built-in plots >>> >>> This doesn't look like a huge list. If this is what is needed for >>> non-programmers to work with Julia without pain, I'd say we have a good >>> chances to get it. >>> >> >> If you look carefully, you'll see work progressing on each and every one >> of these projects, in some cases very rapidly. >> >> * The new 0.4 documentation allows all sorts of access and search >> features with extremely little amounts of code. >> * Refactoring: https://github.com/jakebolewski/JuliaParser.jl/issues/22 >> * UI: There are two predominant threads of work, one in GTK and one in >> Blink (JS-enabled web-like DOM windows). Take a look at the new Immerse.jl >> and https://github.com/JunoLab >> * There's also interesting work in terminals themselves, making the REPL >> more full-featured there. Take a look at TerminalExtensions.jl for iTerm2 >> on OS X: you can display arbitrary images (like plots) inline and capture >> backtraces in order to open an editor directly to the error with a >> double-click. >> >> It's only a matter of time before more of these things come together. I >> think it's really exciting! >> > >
