MIT is very permissive: you can do anything you like with it as long as you give credits to the original authors. So no worries there.
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:51, Christof Stocker <stocker.chris...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, now that I think of it, thats not completely true. I did look at > a MIT licensed code that is very related. Although my code is not in any > way based on it. But I guess it's fair to say that it influenced me by > looking at it. What's the proper way to deal with this situation? Sorry for > hijacking this thread > > Am Freitag, 18. September 2015 16:37:59 UTC+2 schrieb Christof Stocker: >> >> Thank god, almost got a heart attack there. I am just looking at the >> papers in my efforts >> >> On 2015-09-18 16:32, Mauro wrote: >> > Just the implementation. But by looking at the code you look at the >> > implementation. So, it's ok to look at pseudo-code in a paper (even if >> > that paper is under strict copyrights). But if you look at some code >> > and the code up your implementation, then this counts as derivative work >> > and needs to respect the licensing. >> >>
