Actually, now that I think of it, thats not completely true. I did look at a MIT licensed code that is very related. Although my code is not in any way based on it. But I guess it's fair to say that it influenced me by looking at it. What's the proper way to deal with this situation? Sorry for hijacking this thread
Am Freitag, 18. September 2015 16:37:59 UTC+2 schrieb Christof Stocker: > > Thank god, almost got a heart attack there. I am just looking at the > papers in my efforts > > On 2015-09-18 16:32, Mauro wrote: > > Just the implementation. But by looking at the code you look at the > > implementation. So, it's ok to look at pseudo-code in a paper (even if > > that paper is under strict copyrights). But if you look at some code > > and the code up your implementation, then this counts as derivative work > > and needs to respect the licensing. > >
