How do you know they are not interested? On 21 September 2015 at 15:05, Uwe Fechner <uwe.fechner....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did anyone ask Forio if they would change the license (as they are > obviously not longer > interested in the project)? > > Uwe > > Am Montag, 21. September 2015 13:52:57 UTC+2 schrieb Christof Stocker: >> >> I did consider looking into that but as soon as I saw the license I ran >> for my life. Its a similar issue with Julietta. Although what is an issue >> to me doesn't have to be an issue to others >> >> On 2015-09-21 13:48, Steven Sagaert wrote: >> >> +1 >> & to add to Uwe's post: AFAIK JuliaStudio is based on Qt (& QtCreator I >> believe). I thought that JuliaStudio was a nice start (also based on >> QtCreator). I wish a group would fork it and develop it further in the >> direction of RStudio. >> >> On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:08:23 AM UTC+2, Christof Stocker >> wrote: >>> >>> I would be a huge fan of an RStudio like Julia IDE >>> >>> On 2015-09-18 10:05, Uwe Fechner wrote: >>> >>> I like QT a lot. There is more then one open source, QT based IDE out >>> there, e.g. QT Creator. >>> QT has a GUI builder, that is much better then the GUI builders for GTK >>> (in my opinion). >>> And you can use the java-script like QML language for building the user >>> interface, if you want to. >>> >>> Tutorial for PyQT: >>> https://pythonspot.com/qml-and-pyqt-creating-a-gui-tutorial/ >>> >>> As soon as the Julia/C++ integration is available by default (hopefully >>> in Julia 0.5), QT integration >>> should be easy. For those, that want to play with Julia and QT now >>> already, have a look at: >>> >>> https://github.com/jverzani/PySide.jl >>> >>> (very experimental) >>> >>> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015 08:25:44 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Carrera: >>>> >>>> There are no Qt bindings for Julia yet. I also don't know what text >>>> editing component is provided by Qt or what its features are. I began >>>> working with Gtk in part because the Julia Gtk bindings seem to be the most >>>> developed. >>>> >>>> Is there a reason you like Qt besides it being cross-platform? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17 September 2015 at 23:50, SrAceves <mauri.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What about Qt? RStudio is fantastic: Qt based, multi-platoform. >>>>> Everything anyone ever wanted of an IDE. >>>>> >>>>> El martes, 15 de septiembre de 2015, 8:13:04 (UTC-5), Daniel Carrera >>>>> escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Last night I started experimenting with Gtk, and started making a >>>>>> sketch of what a Julia IDE might look like. In the process I am writing >>>>>> down a list of things that are probably needed before a Julia IDE >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> getting a list of things that probably need to exist before a Julia >>>>>> IDE can be completed. This is what I have so far: >>>>>> 1) A Julia package for the GNOME Docking Library >>>>>> >>>>>> I think most people expect that an IDE has docking >>>>>> >>>>>> Despite the name, it does not depend on any GNOME libraries, only >>>>>> Gtk. This is what Anjuta and MonoDevelop use to get docking windows. I >>>>>> think most people expect to be able to move things around in an IDE. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://developer.gnome.org/gdl/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 14 September 2015 at 17:10, <jonatha...@alumni.epfl.ch> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gtk, the code isn't published but it's very similar to Julietta: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://github.com/tknopp/Julietta.jl>https://github.com/tknopp/ >>>>>>> Julietta.jl >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>
