On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:29:54 PM UTC+1, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > I think we're getting into Parkinson's law territory here. First off, I > don't think this causes all that much confusion. Second, since this is pure > syntax involving a keyword no less, this is one of the easiest things to > mechanically fix should we chose to do so in the future. >
Fair enough. Could I just ask a question out of curiosity (not to try to convince anyone of anything)? Are there any technical problems (or other problems) associated with getting '∈' to work as a keyword, such as for i ∈ etc... ?
