A tangent to the current tangent:

https://github.com/randyzwitch/NoveltyColors.jl now on METADATA. Would love 
any feedback or contributions.

On Monday, November 30, 2015 at 6:42:38 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote:
>
> How about using dictionaries -- xkcd[:skyblue] = 0x06c2ac? This would 
> open up the way for source specific named colors (e.g. paints).
>
>
>
> On Monday, November 30, 2015 at 5:38:10 PM UTC-5, Alex Mellnik wrote:
>>
>> On a related note, I've been thinking that it would be nice to include 
>> the results of the xkcd color survey <https://xkcd.com/color/rgb/> in 
>> Colors.jl.  Right now it has the CSS/SVG and X11 colors which is great for 
>> standardization, but sometimes you want to be able to get a RGB value 
>> corresponding to fairly specific and easy-to-remember color names (mocha, 
>> cerulean blue, etc).  I was originally going to stick it in a different 
>> package, but there might be a nice way to separate these names in Colors.jl
>>
>> -A
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 2:08:35 PM UTC-8, Randy Zwitch wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the Julia ecosystem is getting bigger, I figured I'd propose this 
>>> here first and see what people think is the right way forward (instead of 
>>> wasting people's time at METADATA)
>>>
>>> In the R community, they've created two packages of novelty color 
>>> schemes: Wes Anderson <https://github.com/karthik/wesanderson> and 
>>> Beyonce <https://github.com/dill/beyonce>. While humorous, these color 
>>> palettes are interesting to me and I'd like to make them available in 
>>> Vega.jl (and Julia more broadly). Should I:
>>>
>>> 1) Not do it at all....because this is a serious, scientific community!
>>> 2) Do two separate packages, mimicking R
>>> 3) Create a single NoveltyColors.jl package, in case there are other 
>>> palettes that come up in the future
>>> 4) Make a feature request at Colors.jl (really not my favorite choice, 
>>> since there is so much cited research behind the palettes)
>>>
>>> I neglected to mention ColorBrewer.jl (which Vega.jl uses), since 
>>> ColorBrewer is a known entity in the plotting community.
>>>
>>> What do people think? Note, I'm not looking for anyone to do the work 
>>> (I'll do it), just looking for packaging input.
>>>
>>

Reply via email to