On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 3:12:36 AM UTC-5, Tomas Lycken wrote: > > Also, the naming discussion here is not *only* on naming; it's also on > the possibility of including *more things *in the package. I would be all > for having a package like Palettes.jl, which would include both > NoveltyColors.jl and other palettes, but that's not in conflict with the > current package - it's an extension, that might happen tomorrow, in a year, > or never at all, depending on whether someone actually finds it useful > enough to implement it. >
People are free to extend my package as much as they like, or create a wrapper package that aggregates all these different packages. Not sure why that needs a waiting period for my package. On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 1:22:21 PM UTC-5, cormu...@mac.com wrote: > > I'm using [ColorSchemes.jl](https://github.com/cormullion/ColorSchemes.jl) > for my own purposes, but I'm happy to rename it if someone else wants the > name. Is this on METADATA? I thought I had checked, but maybe I had missed. If so, then it makes my package a bit redundant, as I could've submitted a PR to your package. On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 1:39:09 PM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > I'm still pretty unclear on what makes a color scheme a novelty. > > I don't know, it seemed like having a plot based on the colors from the Grand Budapest Hotel or an outfit Beyonce wore would be a novelty, as opposed to something like ColorBrewer which explicitly tries to provide schemes that improve cartography. Since Tim has a majority of the commits on Color.jl and he thought it was an idea that stood on its own (per my reading into his approval comment above), I went with it. I really didn't think it would be this contentious.
