So going deeper into using my own types, and coding style in julia.
Lets say I have the container type
type Foo
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 7:10:15 AM UTC-7, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>
> That was what I was feeling. That this was a legacy issue for lowercase
> type "constructors". Thanks so much.
>
> On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 1:11:41 AM UTC-7, Mauro wrote:
>>
>> I think you should use the constructors if the user expects to construct
>> a certain type, e.g. `Dict()`. Conversely if the user cares about the
>> action then use a function, e.g.:
>>
>> julia> keys(Dict())
>> Base.KeyIterator for a Dict{Any,Any} with 0 entries
>>
>> here I don't care about the type, I just want to iterate the keys.
>>
>> But of course, it's not that clear-cut: `linspace` has history, so does
>> `zeros`. So, for a new container type I'd use the constructor `FooBar`.
>>
>> On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 23:12, Gabriel Gellner <gabriel...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I am currently making some container like types, so I am using the
>> > convention of studly caps for the types ie `FooBar`. For usage I am
>> > confused on what the julian convention is for having expressive type
>> > constructors like for `Dict` and `DataFrame`, versus using methods like
>> > `linspace`. Clearly I could use either, but it is not clear to me when
>> I
>> > should use one convention over the other.
>> >
>> > Clearly I can have my api be like:
>> >
>> > f = FooBar(...)
>> >
>> > or
>> >
>> > f = foobar()
>> >
>> > but is one preferred over the other? Is it just random when to use one
>> or
>> > the other when making container like types?
>>
>
