huhu? question again:
Are you commiting it Larry? or Michael? As you both have done the work.. 
Otherwise people that check the sourceforge statistics think I do all 
the stuff.

However, I can do it if you are too busy :)
Stefan

Stefan Steiniger schrieb:
> great!
> 
> thank you Larry and Michael.
> @Michael: would you do the commit?
> 
> stefan
> 
> Larry Becker wrote:
>> Hi Michaël,
>>
>>   Thanks for the testing.  It sounds like this code change is ready to 
>> be committed.   Also, thanks to your instructions, I was able to 
>> construct island multipolygons and test reading them as shapefiles.   
>> They appear to work, even inside CW holes.
>>
>>   If any Geotools or uDig people are watching this thread, you might 
>> want to consider some changes to your shapefile reader.  Not only will 
>> it not read polygons with clockwise holes, but it defaults everything to 
>> multipolygons, even in files with single shells.
>>
>> regards,
>> Larry Becker
>>
>> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Michael Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi, Larry,
>>
>>     I did some tests today with your new PolygonHandler.
>>     I had no file known for the specific problem the new class is supposed
>>     to solve, but I tried to load several files with more or less valid
>>     geometries.
>>
>>     Most shapefiles have been read exactly the same way with the old code
>>     and with the new code.
>>
>>     The only one with a different result was a big shapefile with many kind
>>     of valid and invalid polygons (37128 polygons)
>>     old code : 37128 objects imported, including 22 empty
>>     GeometryCollections (shapes that the parser could not read)
>>     new code : 37128 objects imported, including 20 empty
>>     GeometryCollections (shapes that the parser could not read)
>>     I cannot say much about the two polygons new new parser could read
>>     except that one is self intersecting (the other is just simple!).
>>     Indeed, the imported polygon have probably been repaired by the
>>     importer, because if I export them again into shapefile, then I can read
>>     them with the old PolygonHandler.
>>
>>     I cannot do much more at home, I'll try to import this shapefile with
>>     arcgis to try to go a step further.
>>
>>     Anyway, the new PolygonHandler can read a little more than the old one,
>>     and that's what it it supposed to do ;-)
>>     (I'm just curious about the 20 objects it still could not read)
>>
>>     I did not benchmark the tests, but I did not notice slowdown.
>>
>>     Michaël
>>
>>
>>     Larry Becker a écrit :
>>      > Hi Michaël,
>>      >
>>      > I found another problem with the PolygonHandler routines I copied
>>     from
>>      > geotools.  It causes MultiPolygons to be created by default
>>     instead of
>>      > simple Polygons.  I restored the original code and inserted the
>>      > modifications for clockwise holes.  Now it is a much less radical
>>     change.
>>      >
>>      > Note that I haven't committed any changes to OpenJump yet, only
>>     SkyJUMP.
>>      >
>>      > regards,
>>      > Larry
>>      >
>>      > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Larry Becker
>>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>      > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
>>     wrote:
>>      >
>>      >     Hi Michaël,
>>      >
>>      >     I've attached OJ's updated PolygonHandler for your review.  It is
>>      >     a fairly radical change so exhaustive testing of shapefile
>>     loading
>>      >     is recommended.
>>      >
>>      >     regards,
>>      >     Larry
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >     On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Michaël Michaud
>>      >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
>>     wrote:
>>      >
>>      >         Hi, Larry
>>      >
>>      >         I'm glad if I could help, thanks again for the hard work.
>>      >         It seems that you found a way to keep both correctness and
>>      >         performance.
>>      >         If you think you can commit, I am very confident.
>>      >         I'll be able to do more tests with complex polygons (but not
>>      >         with CW holes).
>>      >
>>      >         Note : you can create a MultiPolygon with an island by
>>      >         selecting the two
>>      >         polygons, then right click and run Combine Selected Features.
>>      >
>>      >         Regards,
>>      >
>>      >         Michaël
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >        
>>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>      >         This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM)
>>     Conference
>>      >         Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to
>>      >         save $100.
>>      >         Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>>      >        
>>     
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
>>      >         _______________________________________________
>>      >         Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>      >         [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>      >         <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>      >         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >     --
>>      >     http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > --
>>      > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>>      >
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>      >

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to