Hi Ede, Stefan,
Some notes and questions about packaging/releasing
I'm comparing the ant build with the NB maven results and noticed some
differences :
*ant build*
- includes all jar and dll of plus distribution
* I will make a core distribution by hand and update the build to
have choice between core and plus
* I think I just have to exclude batik.jar and PLUS dir for core distro
- manifest includes all jars (should include only core jar)
*maven build (core nb)*
- includes junit.jar which is probably useless for core
- manifest is empty (cannot start OJ from jar)
Question : for your daily developments, do you use and
test OpenJUMP after a compilation made from ant, from mvn or another way ?
*Different jar versions :*
- jdom version is not the same (both 1.0.b8)
* ant : 2002-03-28 (125 ko)
* mvn : 2002-05-18 (88 ko)
==> I'll replace ant version by mvn version
- jts 1.12 : don't know why they have different size, I'll investigate
- jython
* ant : unknown version (704 k - seems to be 2.1 version)
* mvn : 2.2 version (1176 k)
==> any reason we have migrated ?
xercesImpl
* ant : version 2.5.0 according to the manifest (906 k)
* mvn : 2.8.1 (1185 k)
xml-api
* ant : 1.3.0.4 (190 k)
* mvn : xml-apis-1.3.03.jar (191 k)
xmlParserAPI
* ant : xml-api-ext 1.3 (84 k)
* mvn : xmlParserAPIs-2.0.2.jar (77 k)
==> do not contains same packages...
Michaël
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
