Hi, I released 1.5.0 on the main site (only core distribution)
my priorities are now - osgeo-livedvd updates - source distribution - plus distribution - exe installer would be happy if you could test, test and test again... (mainly linux/windows that I did not test at all) - ede, do you know how to setup the svn to create a a 1.5.0 tag and a 1.5.0 branch (trunk woul become the 1.6 branch ?) Ede, I changed the .bat after I found that on windows 64 box having only a 32 bits jvm openjump did not start . Unfortunately, I have now a problem to re-install a 64 bits jvm so I can't test the bat will run in this case too. Can you review the code ? Test it ? Thanks, Michaël Le 07/01/2012 13:34, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit : > On 07.01.2012 10:01, Michaël Michaud wrote: >> Hi Ede, Stefan, >> >> Some notes and questions about packaging/releasing >> >> I'm comparing the ant build with the NB maven results and noticed some >> differences : >> >> *ant build* >> - includes all jar and dll of plus distribution >> * I will make a core distribution by hand and update the build to have >> choice between core and plus >> * I think I just have to exclude batik.jar and PLUS dir for core distro > sounds reasonable. for the sake of administration we should maybe decide to > use either ant or maven? in the future? > >> - manifest includes all jars (should include only core jar) > don't use ant, dunno about it > >> *maven build (core nb)* >> - includes junit.jar which is probably useless for core > you can remove it if you are sure. comment it out in pom.xml. we'll see if > something breaks in the snapshots ;) > >> - manifest is empty (cannot start OJ from jar) > removed it because oj has to be started with the scripts anyway to be useful > >> Question : for your daily developments, do you use and >> test OpenJUMP after a compilation made from ant, from mvn or another way ? > i run and debug with eclipse run configurations. > > for quick checks of fixed or changed functionality by others i use the > snapshots. especially on machines where eclispse is not set up. > >> *Different jar versions :* >> > never changed any of that sorry.. ede > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel