Hi > my priorities are now - osgeo-livedvd updates > what do you mean by these? Update of installation script (done), icon (done) and documentation (to be done) > >> - source distribution >> - plus distribution >> - exe installer > i have the feeling that changing everything in trunk for 1.5 and taking those > snapshots only fixing the strings in readme and properties would do the > trick. don't you think? Yes, the core bin distribution is quite easy. Just need a small todo list not to forget anything (to be written next time if we use maven for release). > > if you could give me the next week i could play with izpack and see if i > could have a n automated installer build setup, who says we have to ave an > installer right away. Yes, I've already used IzPack a long time ago. Nice software. > >> would be happy if you could test, test and test again... (mainly >> linux/windows that I did not test at all) >> - ede, do you know how to setup the svn to create a >> a 1.5.0 tag and a 1.5.0 branch >> (trunk woul become the 1.6 branch ?) > branches make only sense if you plan to actually keep those and take the > doubled effort of patching dev/stable branches with fixes. don't really see > the need for it. a simple tag of the revision should suffice, will do so when > we have that revision. ok? OK, we'll consider the question again when we'll actually have more developpement ressources. > Ede, I changed the .bat after I found that on windows 64 box > having only a 32 bits jvm openjump did not start . > Unfortunately, I have now a problem to re-install a 64 bits jvm > so I can't test the bat will run in this case too. > Can you review the code ? Test it ? > will do .. ede Thanks > >> Thanks, >> >> Michaël >> >> >> Le 07/01/2012 13:34, [email protected] a écrit : >>> On 07.01.2012 10:01, Michaël Michaud wrote: >>>> Hi Ede, Stefan, >>>> >>>> Some notes and questions about packaging/releasing >>>> >>>> I'm comparing the ant build with the NB maven results and noticed some >>>> differences : >>>> >>>> *ant build* >>>> - includes all jar and dll of plus distribution >>>> * I will make a core distribution by hand and update the build to have >>>> choice between core and plus >>>> * I think I just have to exclude batik.jar and PLUS dir for core distro >>> sounds reasonable. for the sake of administration we should maybe decide to >>> use either ant or maven? in the future? >>> >>>> - manifest includes all jars (should include only core jar) >>> don't use ant, dunno about it >>> >>>> *maven build (core nb)* >>>> - includes junit.jar which is probably useless for core >>> you can remove it if you are sure. comment it out in pom.xml. we'll see if >>> something breaks in the snapshots ;) >>> >>>> - manifest is empty (cannot start OJ from jar) >>> removed it because oj has to be started with the scripts anyway to be useful >>> >>>> Question : for your daily developments, do you use and >>>> test OpenJUMP after a compilation made from ant, from mvn or another way ? >>> i run and debug with eclipse run configurations. >>> >>> for quick checks of fixed or changed functionality by others i use the >>> snapshots. especially on machines where eclispse is not set up. >>> >>>> *Different jar versions :* >>>> >>> never changed any of that sorry.. ede >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex >>> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to >>> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual >>> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure >>> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex >> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to >> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual >> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure >> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox >> _______________________________________________ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
