Hello, I am sorry, but I can not find this nice function in the nightly build (I just use the nb from 5th Sept 2008). Could someone please give me the information where I have to look? Many thanks!
Arnd -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:29:21 -0600 > Von: Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: JUMP Users Discussion <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [jump-users] Buffer with attribute value > Hei Larry, > > very nice! > > I think actually that is ok if it does not support union. One can do an > union afterwards. > > thank you > Stefan > > PS: but should we not rather disable the distance entry? (I think if one > uses the attribute calculator then this could be done previously.. > however, I know that SkyJUMP does not have this feature) > > Larry Becker schrieb: > > The first version of Buffer "distance from attribute value" should be > > available in the nightly build. Please let me know if there are > > problems or suggestions. Currently it doesn't support the buffer > > selection or union options. > > > > As a first step toward the proposed formula option, an option with *, > > /, +, - could be added that uses the distance entry. > > > > Larry > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > I haven't forgotten about modifying Buffer to use an attribute. I'm > > working on it at home when I find time. The formula thing is > > secondary to getting the feature working. > > > > Larry > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > When OJ moves to Java 1.6 (as SkyJUMP has) we could use the > > scripting API. See: > > > http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/scripting/ > > > > Until then, however, it would probably involve parsing and > > executing, or a simple interface like Attribute Calculator or > > Simple Query. > > > > Larry > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Stefan Steiniger > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Martin Davis schrieb: > > > > I was thinking that the easiest thing to do would be to > > set the buffer distance based on a single attribute > > value. Your idea of using a formula is even better. > > This seems like it would require defining a formula in > > some language, and being able to parse and execute it. > > Has anyone done anything like this before? (Apart from > > Beanshell - which is a different thing). > > > > yes and no. > > > > Pirol has created a Attribute calculator that I moved over > > to Ojump. > > see under /Tools/Edit Attributes/Attribute Calculator > > > > I am not sure how flexible that tool is (currently it does > > also only basic math: + - * /). > > > > > > > > Side comment: when I get JEQL bolted in to JUMP this > > kind of thing will be come very easy... soon, > hopefully. > > > > Larry Becker wrote: > > > > I agree that creating buffers based on the value of > > an attribute would be useful. At my company, we do > > some buffer analysis that might benefit from this > > capability. I might be able to justify the time to > > extend OJ's buffer tool (which is currently in sync > > with SkyJUMP). > > > > Based on Ravi's past requirements for features that > > support "mineral prognostication" (I love that > > term), his definition of buffers might be more > > complex than mine. :-) For our use, however, I can > > imagine needing the capability to compute the buffer > > distance based on a formula entered by the user. > > > > regards, > > Larry > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Martin Davis > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > Seems like a nice addition to the Buffer tool. > > Should be simple > > to add.... > > > > RAVI KUMAR wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > in an exercise for Mineral prognostication > > now am able to > > achieve most after the 'Polygon Union > > Intersection' is added > > and am very thankful for the same. > > > > However on linear features (Dykes in Geology) > > which are > > supposed to receiving buffering as per > > another attribute, find > > the going repititive. Buffering has to be > > done depending on an > > attribute value of the same table. But am > > forced to split the > > data into as many classes of the attribute > > for buffering them > > and then add all of them (replicate selected > > features) into a > > layer again. > > > > This can be solved if, Buffering can be done > > with an attribute > > value than a constant we are asked to > provide. > > > > Cheers > > Ravi Kumar > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jump-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > -- Martin Davis > > Senior Technical Architect > > Refractions Research, Inc. > > (250) 383-3022 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jump-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jump-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jump-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jump-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > _______________________________________________ > jump-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer _______________________________________________ jump-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
