I enabled the check box and it worked already. I must have forgotten to do that when I made my last change. Try it tomorrow and let me know.
regards, Larry On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Arnd Kielhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Larry, > > that sounds very good! > > Thank You! > > Arnd > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > >But function B) do not provide the opportunity to union the resulting > > buffer features. May be > > >there is a chance to develop it? > > > > The SkyJUMP tool already has this functionality. I should be able to > port > > to OJ soon. > > > > Larry > > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Arnd Kielhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Hello again, > > > > > > I just found out that You get different plugin functions: > > > > > > A) select the feature (e.g. multiline), go to Tools>Buffer: You get the > > old > > > (known) buffer function > > > B) do not select the feature, go to Tools>Buffer: You get the new > buffer > > > option with using attributes values as buffer width > > > > > > It is really a very useful tool! > > > > > > But function B) do not provide the opportunity to union the resulting > > > buffer features. May be there is a chance to develop it? > > > > > > Kindly regards > > > Arnd > > > > > > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > > Datum: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:36:49 +0200 > > > > Von: "Arnd Kielhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > An: JUMP Users Discussion <[email protected]> > > > > Betreff: Re: [jump-users] Buffer with attribute value > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I am sorry, but I can not find this nice function in the nightly > build > > > > (I just use the nb from 5th Sept 2008). > > > > Could someone please give me the information where I have to look? > > > > Many thanks! > > > > > > > > Arnd > > > > > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > > > Datum: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:29:21 -0600 > > > > > Von: Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > An: JUMP Users Discussion <[email protected]> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [jump-users] Buffer with attribute value > > > > > > > > > Hei Larry, > > > > > > > > > > very nice! > > > > > > > > > > I think actually that is ok if it does not support union. One can > do > > an > > > > > union afterwards. > > > > > > > > > > thank you > > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > > > > PS: but should we not rather disable the distance entry? (I think > if > > > one > > > > > uses the attribute calculator then this could be done previously.. > > > > > however, I know that SkyJUMP does not have this feature) > > > > > > > > > > Larry Becker schrieb: > > > > > > The first version of Buffer "distance from attribute value" > should > > be > > > > > > available in the nightly build. Please let me know if there are > > > > > > problems or suggestions. Currently it doesn't support the buffer > > > > > > selection or union options. > > > > > > > > > > > > As a first step toward the proposed formula option, an option > with > > > *, > > > > > > /, +, - could be added that uses the distance entry. > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Larry Becker < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't forgotten about modifying Buffer to use an > > attribute. > > > > I'm > > > > > > working on it at home when I find time. The formula thing is > > > > > > secondary to getting the feature working. > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Larry Becker > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > When OJ moves to Java 1.6 (as SkyJUMP has) we could use > > the > > > > > > scripting API. See: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/scripting/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Until then, however, it would probably involve parsing > and > > > > > > executing, or a simple interface like Attribute > Calculator > > or > > > > > > Simple Query. > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Stefan Steiniger > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin Davis schrieb: > > > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking that the easiest thing to do would > > be > > > > to > > > > > > set the buffer distance based on a single > > attribute > > > > > > value. Your idea of using a formula is even > > better. > > > > > > This seems like it would require defining a > > formula > > > in > > > > > > some language, and being able to parse and > execute > > > it. > > > > > > Has anyone done anything like this before? > > (Apart > > > > from > > > > > > Beanshell - which is a different thing). > > > > > > > > > > > > yes and no. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pirol has created a Attribute calculator that I moved > > > over > > > > > > to Ojump. > > > > > > see under /Tools/Edit Attributes/Attribute Calculator > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure how flexible that tool is (currently it > > > does > > > > > > also only basic math: + - * /). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Side comment: when I get JEQL bolted in to JUMP > > this > > > > > > kind of thing will be come very easy... soon, > > > > > hopefully. > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry Becker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree that creating buffers based on the > > value > > > > of > > > > > > an attribute would be useful. At my company, > > we > > > > do > > > > > > some buffer analysis that might benefit from > > this > > > > > > capability. I might be able to justify the > > time > > > > to > > > > > > extend OJ's buffer tool (which is currently > in > > > > sync > > > > > > with SkyJUMP). > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on Ravi's past requirements for > features > > > > that > > > > > > support "mineral prognostication" (I love > that > > > > > > term), his definition of buffers might be > more > > > > > > complex than mine. :-) For our use, > however, > > I > > > > can > > > > > > imagine needing the capability to compute the > > > > buffer > > > > > > distance based on a formula entered by the > > user. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Martin Davis > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems like a nice addition to the Buffer > > tool. > > > > > > Should be simple > > > > > > to add.... > > > > > > > > > > > > RAVI KUMAR wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > in an exercise for Mineral > > prognostication > > > > > > now am able to > > > > > > achieve most after the 'Polygon Union > > > > > > Intersection' is added > > > > > > and am very thankful for the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > However on linear features (Dykes in > > > > Geology) > > > > > > which are > > > > > > supposed to receiving buffering as per > > > > > > another attribute, find > > > > > > the going repititive. Buffering has to > > be > > > > > > done depending on an > > > > > > attribute value of the same table. But > > am > > > > > > forced to split the > > > > > > data into as many classes of the > > attribute > > > > > > for buffering them > > > > > > and then add all of them (replicate > > > > selected > > > > > > features) into a > > > > > > layer again. > > > > > > > > > > > > This can be solved if, Buffering can > be > > > > done > > > > > > with an attribute > > > > > > value than a constant we are asked to > > > > > provide. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Ravi Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Martin Davis > > > > > > Senior Technical Architect > > > > > > Refractions Research, Inc. > > > > > > (250) 383-3022 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected] > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! > > > > Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > jump-users mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > -- > > > GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry > > > Passion! > > > > > > > > > http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free/puzzle/6169196 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jump-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/ > > -- > Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen? > Der Eine für Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03 > _______________________________________________ > jump-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users > -- http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ jump-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
