Hello Larry,

that sounds very good!

Thank You!

Arnd

> Hi Arnd,
> 
> >But function B) do not provide the opportunity to union the resulting
> buffer features. May be
> >there is a chance to develop it?
> 
> The SkyJUMP tool already has this functionality.  I should be able to port
> to OJ soon.
> 
> Larry
> 
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Arnd Kielhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I just found out that You get different plugin functions:
> >
> > A) select the feature (e.g. multiline), go to Tools>Buffer: You get the
> old
> > (known) buffer function
> > B) do not select the feature, go to Tools>Buffer: You get the new buffer
> > option with using attributes values as buffer width
> >
> > It is really a very useful tool!
> >
> > But function B) do not provide the opportunity to union the resulting
> > buffer features. May be there is a chance to develop it?
> >
> > Kindly regards
> > Arnd
> >
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:36:49 +0200
> > > Von: "Arnd Kielhorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > An: JUMP Users Discussion <[email protected]>
> > > Betreff: Re: [jump-users] Buffer with attribute value
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am sorry, but I can not find this nice function in the nightly build
> > > (I just use the nb from 5th Sept 2008).
> > > Could someone please give me the information where I have to look?
> > > Many thanks!
> > >
> > > Arnd
> > >
> > > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > > Datum: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:29:21 -0600
> > > > Von: Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > An: JUMP Users Discussion <[email protected]>
> > > > Betreff: Re: [jump-users] Buffer with attribute value
> > >
> > > > Hei Larry,
> > > >
> > > > very nice!
> > > >
> > > > I think actually that is ok if it does not support union. One can do
> an
> > > > union afterwards.
> > > >
> > > > thank you
> > > > Stefan
> > > >
> > > > PS: but should we not rather disable the distance entry? (I think if
> > one
> > > > uses the attribute calculator then this could be done previously..
> > > > however, I know that SkyJUMP does not have this feature)
> > > >
> > > > Larry Becker schrieb:
> > > > > The first version of Buffer "distance from attribute value" should
> be
> > > > > available in the nightly build.  Please let me know if there are
> > > > > problems or suggestions.  Currently it doesn't support the buffer
> > > > > selection or union options.
> > > > >
> > > > > As a first step toward the proposed formula option, an option with
> >  *,
> > > > > /, +, - could be added that uses the distance entry.
> > > > >
> > > > > Larry
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Larry Becker <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     I haven't forgotten about modifying Buffer to use an
> attribute.
> > > I'm
> > > > >     working on it at home when I find time.  The formula thing is
> > > > >     secondary to getting the feature working.
> > > > >
> > > > >     Larry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Larry Becker
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >         When OJ moves to Java 1.6 (as SkyJUMP has) we could use
> the
> > > > >         scripting API. See:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/scripting/
> > > > >
> > > > >         Until then, however, it would probably involve parsing and
> > > > >         executing, or a simple interface like Attribute Calculator
> or
> > > > >         Simple Query.
> > > > >
> > > > >         Larry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >         On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Stefan Steiniger
> > > > >         <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >             Martin Davis schrieb:
> > > > >
> > > > >                 I was thinking that the easiest thing to do would
> be
> > > to
> > > > >                 set the buffer distance based on a single
> attribute
> > > > >                 value.  Your idea of using a formula is even
> better.
> > > > >                 This seems like it would require defining a
> formula
> > in
> > > > >                 some language, and being able to parse and execute
> > it.
> > > > >                  Has anyone done anything like this before? 
> (Apart
> > > from
> > > > >                 Beanshell - which is a different thing).
> > > > >
> > > > >             yes and no.
> > > > >
> > > > >             Pirol has created a Attribute calculator that I moved
> > over
> > > > >             to Ojump.
> > > > >             see under /Tools/Edit Attributes/Attribute Calculator
> > > > >
> > > > >             I am not sure how flexible that tool is (currently it
> > does
> > > > >             also only basic math: + - * /).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >                 Side comment: when I get JEQL bolted in to JUMP
> this
> > > > >                 kind of thing will be come very easy...  soon,
> > > > hopefully.
> > > > >
> > > > >                 Larry Becker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >                     I agree that creating buffers based on the
> value
> > > of
> > > > >                     an attribute would be useful.  At my company,
> we
> > > do
> > > > >                     some buffer analysis that might benefit from
> this
> > > > >                     capability.  I might be able to justify the
> time
> > > to
> > > > >                     extend OJ's buffer tool (which is currently in
> > > sync
> > > > >                     with SkyJUMP).
> > > > >
> > > > >                     Based on Ravi's past requirements for features
> > > that
> > > > >                     support "mineral prognostication" (I love that
> > > > >                     term), his definition of buffers might be more
> > > > >                     complex than mine.  :-)  For our use, however,
> I
> > > can
> > > > >                     imagine needing the capability to compute the
> > > buffer
> > > > >                     distance based on a formula entered by the
> user.
> > > > >
> > > > >                     regards,
> > > > >                     Larry
> > > > >
> > > > >                     On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Martin Davis
> > > > >                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >                     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >                        Seems like a nice addition to the Buffer
> tool.
> > > > >                      Should be simple
> > > > >                        to add....
> > > > >
> > > > >                        RAVI KUMAR wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >                            Hi all,
> > > > >                            in an exercise for Mineral
> prognostication
> > > > >                     now am able to
> > > > >                            achieve most after the 'Polygon Union
> > > > >                     Intersection' is added
> > > > >                            and am very thankful for the same.
> > > > >
> > > > >                            However on linear features (Dykes in
> > > Geology)
> > > > >                     which are
> > > > >                            supposed to receiving buffering as per
> > > > >                     another attribute, find
> > > > >                            the going repititive. Buffering has to
> be
> > > > >                     done depending on an
> > > > >                            attribute value of the same table. But
> am
> > > > >                     forced to split the
> > > > >                            data into as many classes of the
> attribute
> > > > >                     for buffering them
> > > > >                            and then add all of them (replicate
> > > selected
> > > > >                     features) into a
> > > > >                            layer again.
> > > > >
> > > > >                            This can be solved if, Buffering can be
> > > done
> > > > >                     with an attribute
> > > > >                            value than a constant we are asked to
> > > > provide.
> > > > >
> > > > >                            Cheers
> > > > >                            Ravi Kumar
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > >                            jump-users mailing list
> > > > >                            [email protected]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > >                           
> <mailto:[email protected]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > > >
> > > > >                        --     Martin Davis
> > > > >                        Senior Technical Architect
> > > > >                        Refractions Research, Inc.
> > > > >                        (250) 383-3022
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > > > >                        jump-users mailing list
> > > > >                        [email protected]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > >                        <mailto:[email protected]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >                     --
> > > > >                     http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >                    
> _______________________________________________
> > > > >                     jump-users mailing list
> > > > >                     [email protected]
> > > > >                     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > >
> > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >             _______________________________________________
> > > > >             jump-users mailing list
> > > > >             [email protected]
> > > > >             <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > >            
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >         --
> > > > >         http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     --
> > > > >     http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jump-users mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jump-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > >
> > > --
> > > Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> > > Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jump-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> >
> > --
> > GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry
> > Passion!
> >
> >
> http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free/puzzle/6169196
> > _______________________________________________
> > jump-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/

-- 
Psssst! Schon das coole Video vom GMX MultiMessenger gesehen?
Der Eine für Alle: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/messenger03
_______________________________________________
jump-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users

Reply via email to