>* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kanagaraj Krishna) [Fri 16 Mar 2007, 20:51 CET]:
>>I've heard that although the load balance option is known as
>>"per-packet" but it behaves more like "per flow". Meaning packets
>>would not be breaked up and merged on the other end. Am i right?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri 16 Mar 2007, 20:57 CET]:
>It *is* per flow. The old IP 1 could do per packet, current IP 2 cannot.
That's a feature. Per-packet load-balancing can easily lead to packet
reordering.
-- Niels.
--
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
