On Fri Mar 16, 2007, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
Hello, You do not need to export your load-balance policy to your remote peer. You need ot export it into the forwarding table. Thanks German > Yes it can. > > You'll need all those plus for best result, enable per-flow load balancing. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration policy-options policy-statement > load-balance > then { > load-balance per-packet; > } > > This policy is then applied under BGP peer and forwarding table export > policies. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration protocols bgp group peer1 > type external; > multihop { > ttl 3; > } > local-address 1.1.1.1; > import import-routes; > export [ export-routes load-balance ]; > remove-private; > peer-as 1234; > neighbor 2.2.2.2; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration routing-options forwarding-table > export load-balance; > > /ihsan > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kanagaraj Krishna > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:11 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP load balancing on 2 links (same ISP) > > Hi, > Which is the best way to get BGP load balancing up and running with the > same provider on a m7i using loopback IP? I've realised quite a number > enquiries on this matter on most forum. Can it be done? In cisco usually the > things needed are: > > - 2 static routes pointing to the providers loopback IP > - ebgp multihop config > - update source loopback > > Regards, > Kana > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
pgpbT9MInD6JC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp