We're in the same 10G boat as Ken and Mark so I'm really appreciating all the contributions to this thread! Actually have a meeting next week with our Juniper account to discuss 10G platforms so this topic is very timely.
We have 3 m10i's in our extranet with a couple of OC12 PICs, AS-PICs. IPv4/ someday IPv6, Multicast. Thanks, Phil -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ken lindahl Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:17 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Upgrade from M10i? On 2/3/2009 6:30 AM, Mark Johnson wrote: > We need at least 4 x 10G ports and 8 x 1G ports, IPv4/IPv6, > OSPFv2/OSPFv3, full BGP (peering/transit), no MPLS and that's about it. > > While I love Junipers I would consider Cisco so if anyone might > suggest suitable Cisco models I'd also appreciate that. > > Kind regards, > > Mark i'm have approximately the same requirements as Mark and considering the MX480 vs M120 choice, so i very much appreciate the comments folks have made about the MX series. we have an M120 and are happy with it, but there is a substantial price difference between the MX480 and M120, and we have no need for non-ethernet interfaces. Mark did not mention multicast explicitly; we need this router to do IPv4/IPv6 multicast. has anyone got any experience with multicast on the MX series? thanks, ken p.s.: it's worth noting that adding "tunnel PIC capability" to an MX, in order to have it act as an RP, uses a full slot in the chassis. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp