Yes, my bad. The configs are exactly the same as it relates to the ibgp group, so I copied the original one and just replaced IPs. I assure you they are the same!
-evt > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff S Wheeler > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:01 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes > > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:46 -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote: > > Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in this state. > > >>From the config below does not seem this is the case. Perhaps add > > keep-all, restart/soft clear session, and then display hidden. Perhaps > > something will jump out. > > > > Does tracing show any errors when the routes are processed? Unreachable > > next hop normally is just hidden so does not seem the case here. Should > > not matter, but I normally doe not specify peer-as for an int group. > > Again should not break things but worth trying w/o. > Configuring peer-as for an iBGP group does not break anything. I think > you agree with my suspicion that it is a cluster list loop or similar > sanity check failure. > > Eric's last post including some config is confusing, I think because > both the "working" and "non-working" routers are called edge01, or more > likely the paste is in error. I suggest pastebin. > > -- > Jeff S Wheeler <j...@inconcepts.biz> +1-212-981-0607 > Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp